🔗 Share this article

January 30th, 1972 is remembered as arguably the deadliest – and momentous – occasions in thirty years of violence in this area.

Within the community where it happened – the memories of the tragic events are painted on the walls and etched in collective memory.

A protest demonstration was organized on a cold but bright day in the city.

The demonstration was challenging the practice of internment – holding suspects without trial – which had been implemented after an extended period of violence.

Military personnel from the Parachute Regiment shot dead multiple civilians in the neighborhood – which was, and still is, a overwhelmingly nationalist area.

One image became particularly iconic.

Images showed a religious figure, the priest, displaying a stained with blood fabric as he tried to protect a assembly carrying a young man, the injured teenager, who had been mortally injured.

News camera operators documented much footage on the day.

Historical records includes Father Daly informing a journalist that troops "gave the impression they would fire in all directions" and he was "completely sure" that there was no provocation for the discharge of weapons.

This account of events wasn't accepted by the first inquiry.

The first investigation found the soldiers had been shot at first.

Throughout the resolution efforts, the administration commissioned a fresh examination, after campaigning by bereaved relatives, who said Widgery had been a whitewash.

In 2010, the conclusion by the investigation said that generally, the paratroopers had initiated shooting and that zero among the individuals had posed any threat.

At that time Prime Minister, the leader, issued an apology in the House of Commons – declaring deaths were "without justification and inexcusable."

The police commenced look into the incident.

An ex-soldier, known as Soldier F, was brought to trial for murder.

He was charged over the killings of the first individual, twenty-two, and twenty-six-year-old the second individual.

Soldier F was also accused of seeking to harm multiple individuals, additional persons, further individuals, another person, and an unnamed civilian.

Remains a legal order protecting the defendant's privacy, which his lawyers have claimed is essential because he is at danger.

He testified the investigation that he had only fired at people who were possessing firearms.

That claim was dismissed in the concluding document.

Material from the investigation would not be used immediately as proof in the criminal process.

In court, the veteran was screened from view behind a blue curtain.

He spoke for the opening instance in court at a session in that month, to answer "innocent" when the allegations were read.

Relatives of the victims on Bloody Sunday travelled from Londonderry to the courthouse every day of the case.

One relative, whose relative was died, said they understood that attending the proceedings would be emotional.

"I visualize everything in my memory," he said, as we walked around the main locations mentioned in the trial – from the street, where his brother was shot dead, to the adjoining Glenfada Park, where one victim and William McKinney were died.

"It even takes me back to my position that day.

"I helped to carry my brother and put him in the ambulance.

"I relived every moment during the evidence.

"Despite enduring everything – it's still valuable for me."