🔗 Share this article

Recognizing necessary alterations

The Portuguese coach's chosen wing-back setup cannot be blamed entirely of Manchester United's difficulties. Old Trafford are bouncing back from years of poor stewardship and the current squad is still developing, with strengths in some areas while significant weaknesses persist elsewhere.

Nevertheless, systemic issues characterize Amorim's preferred formation, most notably underloads in central areas and issues out wide that need addressing. Previous managers have effectively handled analogous problems – the Italian manager with Chelsea and the Austrian coach at Selhurst Park prove that player movement outweighs initial formations.

Amorim recently stated: "The tactical setup isn't at fault, the results are," which resembles addressing consequences while ignoring underlying problems. Opposing teams have regularly exposed similar flaws in United's setup for nearly a year, not resulting from squad confusion but as the tactical plan itself contains inherent flaws.

Consequently, supporters cannot anticipate a magical fix where everything falls into place, similar to big-money transfers cannot single-handedly fix the underlying issues. The London club's recent match acts as a prime case – even after losing their manager and crucial performers during the offseason, they adjusted their system deliberately to target Amorim's unchanged tactics.

During the Dutch manager's arrived at Old Trafford, it was soon clear that Ajax's playing style didn't transfer to the English top flight; his inability to adjust was fundamental in his eventual departure. Now Amorim – who appears to have every required attribute for management's greatest challenge apart from adaptability – is repeating similar errors and squandering a golden opportunity. For the first time the club has owners focused on achieving success rather than financial gain.

Adjusting the outside centre-backs

Outside centre-backs play crucial roles in the current setup: they carry possession forward, perform defensive interventions, patrol defensive channels, switch play, build from the back and support attacks. Any tactical analyst might wonder whether employing a duo of such versatile players in a back three seems reasonable when a back four could solve central problems.

At the moment, these centre-backs are being pinned by opposing attackers who, by standing nearby, hinder them from advancing into midfield as the system requires. This development enables clubs with midfield overloads to play around United's midfield, causing pressing concerns that need addressing.

Potential fixes include directing defenders to advance regardless – although this could leave vulnerability at the back – or withdrawing the attacker to improve build-up play, reducing offensive output but utilizing his carrying ability. The most logical adjustment involves changing the high-press system from the current aggressive setup to a more balanced 4-4-2 that ensures superior organization and eliminates the need for centre-backs to push forward.

Bringing back the young midfielder

The manager's chosen approach of chaotic direct football requires United to sacrifice possession and rely on long balls, banking on exceptional quality rather than systematic chance creation. Although expected goals data suggest improvement, visual evidence show that current chance creation come mainly from penalty awards and speculative attempts rather than consistent attacking.

Top-level teams manage proceedings through rhythm management. The Red Devils' failure to do this cannot be entirely blamed on the manager's tactics; sources suggest he requested new midfielders during the offseason but met disagreement from football director. Regardless of blame, the existing condition proves unworkable.

The manager's first-choice pairing of the experienced midfielders, with Manuel Ugarte serving as alternative, has limited opportunities for the young Englishman. While legitimate concerns exist about his athletic maturity and forward distribution, benching this potential generates concerns about the tactical plan's suitability.

Casemiro, Fernandes and Ugarte personify fast-paced play, whereas Mainoo offers rhythm variation. With his former club, his side could play direct football due to quality superiority against most Primeira Liga opponents, confident they would win the ball back if possession turned over. But in English football, the standard throughout means careless possession loss gets punished immediately, while physical dominance alone doesn't ensure victory.

Mainoo's technical quality stands out, and even if playing him with the Portuguese captain raises protection issues, such deficiencies prove less important in a possession-dominant team. Given United's defensive record showing they concede better opportunities than every other team, including the youngster looks logical to test as different methods have already failed. While uncertainty remains about his exact role in this system, regular playing time represents the best development path and probably wouldn't damage present conditions.

Improving wing effectiveness

On United's right side, the pairing of the two attackers should theoretically work given their similar characteristics of creativity, intelligence and determination. When combined with the right-sided centre-back, they could form an effective combination that increases goal threat. At present though, predictable positioning makes marking straightforward for organized defenses.

The manager needs to introduce structured rotation patterns that create uncertainty through regular movement. Ball distribution need to demonstrate variety – preventing static possession but often into space to maximize attacking momentum. This tactic allows central penetration, eliminating markers and generating opportunities for attempts on goal or deliveries.

On the opposite flank, the young defender often obtains the ball in dangerous positions even without the necessary ability to capitalize effectively. Modifying his role slightly deeper would utilize his defensive ability and driving runs to {supply more creative players|service better attackers|provide for